In pharmaceuticals alert and action limits are very important. These limits are used to have effective control over the process.
Alert Limits: Alert limits are in house limits which are defined based on the trend analysis. These limits are like a barrier before the final action limits, given by different regulatory agencies. We have to be alert if microbial count reach to this alert level. It is not necessary to take any action when count reach to alert limit level but we have to be alert as this is a trigger that something is going wrong within the environment and microbial contamination is increasing in the area.
Action Limits: Action limits are also in house limits which are defined based on the trend analysis. When microbial contamination reach to these action limits then action is mandatory to control the contamination in area otherwise if not controlled, we might get area failure. These alert and action limits must be less then the final limits defined by different guidelines and regulatory agencies. For example in case of settle plate exposure, 5 cfu's is the final limit for class B area defined by EU GMP and Drug and Cosmetic act (Schedule M). If we work on this final limit of 5 cfu's then there are chances that we may get more than 5 cfu's in class B and this results in area failure because there is no limit barrier before this final limit. But if we define in house limits like 3 cfu's for alert limit and 4 cfu's for action limits (based on trend data) then we have two barriers before the final limit and there would not be any chance of area failure because if microbial count increases and reach at this in house alert and action limit then we have lot of time to control the area by taking effective action. But if we work with final limits mentioned in guidelines then area results would be either less then 5 cfu's or more than 5 cfu's which means results would be either pass or fail. So, its better to set alert and action limits based on the trend data.
Alert Limits: Alert limits are in house limits which are defined based on the trend analysis. These limits are like a barrier before the final action limits, given by different regulatory agencies. We have to be alert if microbial count reach to this alert level. It is not necessary to take any action when count reach to alert limit level but we have to be alert as this is a trigger that something is going wrong within the environment and microbial contamination is increasing in the area.
Action Limits: Action limits are also in house limits which are defined based on the trend analysis. When microbial contamination reach to these action limits then action is mandatory to control the contamination in area otherwise if not controlled, we might get area failure. These alert and action limits must be less then the final limits defined by different guidelines and regulatory agencies. For example in case of settle plate exposure, 5 cfu's is the final limit for class B area defined by EU GMP and Drug and Cosmetic act (Schedule M). If we work on this final limit of 5 cfu's then there are chances that we may get more than 5 cfu's in class B and this results in area failure because there is no limit barrier before this final limit. But if we define in house limits like 3 cfu's for alert limit and 4 cfu's for action limits (based on trend data) then we have two barriers before the final limit and there would not be any chance of area failure because if microbial count increases and reach at this in house alert and action limit then we have lot of time to control the area by taking effective action. But if we work with final limits mentioned in guidelines then area results would be either less then 5 cfu's or more than 5 cfu's which means results would be either pass or fail. So, its better to set alert and action limits based on the trend data.
